PP UK PP Theory Optimism Optimism and Positive Illusions

Optimism and Positive Illusions
(10 votes, average 3.60 out of 5)

Katie Nicholson

The positive psychology movement has built upon working towards the positive aspects of ‘human strengths and virtues’ (Sheldon & King, 2001), and the ‘aspects of the human conditioning that lead to happiness’ (The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2005, cited in Linley, Joseph, Harrington & Wood, 2006), rather than being focused on healing (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). The power of positive thinking to promote well-being is encouraged with confident thoughts providing an optimistic outlook on life (Marshall, Wortman, Kusulas, Hervig & Vickers, 1992). With the movement still being very fresh within the academia of psychology there appears to be plenty of scope for future research.

In modern day life optimism has become a desirable characteristic, and an important component of human functioning (Peterson, 2006). The position of optimism appears to have changed according to the way that modern societies behave. It could be argued that it has always existed however it has only recently been brought to the forefront ‘when people started to think ahead’ therefore ‘something had to develop....and that something was optimism’ (Tiger, 1979,  as cited in Peterson, 2000).

A widely recognised definition of optimism is: ‘a mood or attitude associated with an expectation about the social or material future, one which the evaluator regards as socially desirable, to his or her advantage, or for his or her pleasure’ (Tiger 1979, as cited in Peterson, 2006). This definition gives ownership to the individual as to how they perceive optimism as it largely depends on how they interpret the terminology (Tiger 1979, as cited in Peterson, 2006). From this we can see how optimism can be used as a powerful coping strategy and even a method of motivation by providing hope that something can be achieved.

Positive illusions involve individuals viewing themselves in a positive way, and mentally healthy people do this very well (Ben Ze’ev, 2000).  However this personal view could lead to biased behaviours to enhance their personal quality of life (Taylor & Brown, 1988, as cited in Taylor & Gollwitzer, 1995), and could potentially lead to a distorted reality that may be harmful (Ben Ze’ev, 2000; Schneider, 2001). If an individual has a distorted view then this could influence their decision making and their connection with reality.

Scheier and Carver (1985) have completed extensive research into generalised outcome expectancies within optimism in our lives. They have actively sourced a range of literature and defined optimism as ‘the global generalized tendency to believe that one will generally experience good versus bad outcomes in life’ (Scheier & Carver, 1985). In simplistic form, this definition states that a confident individual looking at life in a positive way can potentially experience a brighter life. With this in mind the impact that optimism can have on an individual combined with positive illusions can surely only have one conclusive outcome, this being a positive impact on personal well-being.

The purpose of this article is to explore the literature surrounding optimism and positive illusions and to consider how they contribute to the field of positive psychology. Ultimately the article ventures through discussions on optimism as big and little and the influence optimism has on health. Also it looks at how positive illusions influence mood and finally how optimism and positive illusions combine and what current research has taken place. In conclusion the article establishes what future research this discipline requires to expand upon the current literature.

Big Optimism and Little Optimism

Within optimism we distinguish between two types – big optimism and little optimism. Little optimism reflects specific expectations about positive outcomes, and big optimism has generalised larger expectancies with positive outcomes (Peterson, 2006).

The creative thoughts and ideas that instigate big optimism nationally can be Government led. They are aiming to create an optimistic society with regards to many of their initiatives including the economical well being and global climate. Government are aiming to use big optimism to re-gain the nations trust and prove that they can be successful. Little optimism is focused on achieving specific outcomes that are deemed more realistic. Government will use little optimism to create public interest and maintain support in stating they will achieve short term goals. Government have not always been truthful to themselves or society with their optimistic views. Therefore the current way of thinking is very negative towards Government initiatives, and many people are very pessimistic because of this.

Big optimism makes society possible (Peterson, 2006) and different societies share similar characteristics of optimism. As Peterson (2006) concludes all societies experience the benefits of optimism as long as it is approached in the correct way and is not distorting one’s self perceptions (Ben Ze’ev, 2000; Schneider, 2001). However, much of the research into this field has been ethnocentric making it difficult to generalise findings. This provides avenues for potential future research.

Optimism and Health

Optimism in improving health can be supported by the work of Taylor, Kemeny, Reed, Bower & Gruenewald (2000). This research states that if an individual can practice optimistic habits then they can enhance their personal health. However surely it is difficult for individuals to suddenly know how to do this and how to apply it. Positive illusions are deemed to have protective psychological effects on preserving mental health as well as improving it (Taylor et al., 2000). Carver and Scheier (2002) confirm that positive thinking impacts the way that individuals respond in different situations. Therefore optimism is having positive influences on healthy behaviours. However it can be argued that an optimistic person can underestimate the risks of illness (Peterson, 2006), because they are confident that everything will be ok and potentially oversee the risks involved. Potentially an individual who appears to be very optimistic when it comes to illness is actually in denial as to the seriousness of it, and optimism becomes their method of coping.

Positive psychologists largely document the benefits of optimism, positive illusions and improved health. With positive psychologists focusing on optimal functioning of people (Gable & Haidt, 2005, as cited in Gross, 2009) the move towards positive illusions and optimism in promoting well-being is an area for future research.

Positive Illusions and Mood

It seems consistent to report that optimism produces positive moods and acts as a motivating tool. The mood that is experienced can influence the way individuals view life. The way we process information can be altered depending on the mood being experienced and this can affect our thoughts (Smith & Crabbe, 2000). If a positive mood can be encouraged over a period of time then access to positive emotions is inevitable (Buckworth & Dishman, 2002), and experiencing positive illusions can become a natural occurrence (Taylor & Gollwitzer, 1995). Taylor and Brown (1988; 1994, as cited in Robins & Beer, 2001) stated that positive illusions promote psychological well-being, and evidence from Nadelhoffer and Matveeva (2009) suggests that illusions may help contribute to overall well-being. Positive illusions are unique to the individual creating focus on their destiny (Sheldon & King, 2001), rather than being treated as one homogeneous group. With the modern daily pressures on society it is unlikely that individuals will stay in one constant mood state. Therefore encouraging positive illusions to build upon positive moods is a vital component of psychological well-being.

Positive illusions may be the result of immediate changes in mood that can be experienced on a daily basis (Taylor, Aspinwall & Giuliano, 1993), but this does not go to say that positive illusions are being experienced at all times. It is not reliable to conclude that changes in mood are the only causational factor to experiencing positive illusions (Taylor & Gollwitzer, 1995).

Taylor and Brown (1988, as cited in Taylor & Gollwitzer, 1995) clearly identified that people have to have ‘time-outs’ from positive illusions to provide them with time to be honest to themselves. This analysis is vital for positive human functioning as if we are always considering a positive outlook through positive illusions then one may over exaggerate thoughts and become disillusioned causing a negative impact on their well-being.

Optimists and Positive Illusions

Research identifies that a better sense of humour can create more positive cognitive appraisals (Kuiper, Martin & Olinger, 1993). Conclusions are drawn to associate optimism with positive emotional states but research seems inconsistent as to whether pessimists can also experience these states (Marshall et al., 1992). Kaniel, Massey & Robinson (n.d.) highlighted that pessimists can also experience positive illusions, therefore it is unfair to say that only optimists experience positive illusions.

Positive illusions can impact decision making in certain situations and at times can also be part of a learning process (Taylor & Brown, 1988; Chambers & Windschitl, 2004), in particular for optimists who engage rapidly with new tasks (Rasmussen, Wrosch, Scheier, & Carver, 2006). It would seem logic to assume that the more experience individual‘s have had in different situations the more they are able to allow optimism to influence their positive illusions (Kaniel et al., n.d.), meaning that an optimistic person is able to relax in different environments and allow positive illusions to take over (Armor & Taylor, 1998; Radcliffe & Klein, 2002).

Based on longitudinal research it appears that this is not the case and optimists positive illusions actually decrease through experience while pessimists increase (Kaniel et al., n.d.). Drawing upon this we can identify a weakness in the psychological literature where many would presume optimism and positive illusions come hand in hand, however this is not the case creating questioning around the accuracy of research in this field of study.

It is automatically believed that because experiencing positive emotions is well documented (Tugade, Fredrickson & Barrett, 2004) and optimism is experienced through hopefulness and confidence that positive illusions would develop with these psychological feelings and become more prominent as new experiences occur. Kaniel et al., (n.d.) state this is not the case and pessimists experience more positive illusions. In considering this within the movement of positive psychology, pessimists may actually experience positive illusions that provide a better response to certain situations than what optimists may choose. Although it would seem natural to always link optimistic view points and positive psychology, perhaps it should be considered that too much optimism is not such a good thing and that individuals should select a careful balance between optimism and pessimism to create a positive evaluation and appraisal of life that is realistic.

Optimism, Positive Illusions and Research

The current way of thinking can certainly impact measures of optimism and cause fluctuations in its results (Taylor & Gollwitzer, 1995). The Life Orientation Test (LOT) developed by Scheier and Carver (1985) is designed to measure the levels of optimism that are being experienced. The LOT is a self report test that requires individuals to rate themselves on a 0 (strongly disagree) – 4 (strongly agree) scale.  It is important to evaluate the limitations of any tools used for research. As with all self measures the LOT falls prey to numerous potential flaws. The test requires that the subject is honest in their answers and that they have a proper understanding of the questions being asked. With the negative stigma attached to pessimistic characteristics there is potential for subjects to rate themselves untruthfully in order to appear more optimistic and therefore ‘healthier’.

Gender based research into optimism seems inconsistent (Marshall et al., 1992; Taylor & Gollwitzer, 1995). It appears that much of the research in specific areas is heavily based on one sex from a defined group. In respect to the growing popularity of optimism in the study of positive psychology, more research is required to develop further literature reviews. Similarly the research based on positive illusions is self reported. This leaves potential risk to individuals boosting their self esteem protecting themselves rather than completing the self report measures accurately. The environment that many positive illusion tests take place has the potential for inaccurate responses as many studies have been completed in laboratories which despite meaning they are done under control it reduces their ecological validity (Robins & Beer, 2001). Future research is required in a natural setting to gain strengthened results surrounding the area of positive illusions.

The study of optimism is widely documented and so too is the study of positive illusions. Both of these research areas are predominantly reviewed separately (Kaniel et al., n.d.). There appears to be little published research documenting these concepts combined. With separate studies now clearly established, it would be beneficial for research to combine these concepts and report on their joint impact in the field of positive psychology.

Conclusion

The relationship between optimism and positive illusions is a relatively new research area in positive psychology and requires further developments to identify casual links between the two. Based upon the evidence identified we can develop optimism over a period of time which in turn can enhance quality of life (Seligman, 1998).

Positive illusions are associated with individuals seeing themselves in the best possible light, however as Pritchett (2007) identified many people actually view themselves wrongly. In experiencing these positive illusions individuals must self report accurately to prevent disillusioned images. Positive psychology can be developed in society with accurate use of positive illusions and optimism to build upon a thriving nation. In order for this to occur individuals need to be made more aware of what optimism is and how positive illusions are experienced.

In order to experience positive illusions it is clear that an individual does not have to be an optimist; research indicates that pessimists experience more. Positive psychology requires individuals to be able to experience the positive aspects of life rather than those negative, therefore the ability to evaluate clearly and accurately allows individuals to observe exactly what aspects of the positive psychology movement they require to achieve these positive experiences.

Based on the analysis of positive illusions and optimism it can be summarised that both of these branches in research do contribute to the positive psychology movement. It is apparent that there is a gap in the research whereby positive illusions and optimism have been treated very separately and require further consideration as one topic.

Carver and Scheier (1990) clearly identified optimism as cognitive, emotional and motivating. This is reflective in the analysis of the research and in connection with the outcome desires of positive psychology in that it can have a positive impact in all aspects of our lifestyles and that any strand within the movement should be aiming to achieve this.

Positive psychology could shape the future research on optimism and positive illusions (Peterson, 2006). What is meant by this is that rather than researching around finding a link between optimism, positive illusions and positive psychology, a research topic within the field of positive psychology could lean towards developing a thorough understanding of how it needs these disciplines to flourish as the academia surrounding it grows. This may gain more of an insight into an extended application of positive psychology.

References

Armor, D., & Taylor, S. (1998). Situated optimism: Specific outcome expectancies and self regulation. In Advances in experimental social psychology. In Kaniel, R., Massey, C., & Robinson D. T. (n.d.). Optimism without illusion: The impact of experience on expectations.

Ben Ze’ev, A. (2000). The Subtlety of Emotions. United States of America.

Buckworth, J., & Dishman, R. K. (2002). Exercise Psychology. United States: Human Kinetics.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. In Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2002). Optimism. In C. R. Snyder and S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Chambers, J. R., & Windschitl, P. (2004). Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. In Kaniel, R., Massey, C., & Robinson D. T. (n.d.). Optimism without illusion: The impact of experience on expectations.

Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology. In Gross, R. (2009). Themes, Issues and Debates in Psychology. Third Edition. Malta: Hodder Education.

Kaniel, R., Massey, C., & Robinson D. T. (n.d.). Optimism without illusion: The impact of experience on expectations.

Kuiper, N. A., Martin, R. A., & Olinger, L. J. (1993). Coping humour, stress, and cognitive appraisals. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 25, 81-96.

Marshall, G. N., Wortman, C. B., Kusulas, J. W., Hervig, L. K., & Vickers, R. R. (1992). Distinguishing Optimism From Pessimism: Relations to Fundamental Dimensions of Mood and Personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62 (6), 1067-1074.

Nadelhoffer, T., & Matveeva, T. (2009). Positive Illusions, Perceived Control, and the Free Will Debate. Mind and Language, 24 (5), 495-522. Blackwell Publishing.

Peterson, C. (2000). The Future of Optimism. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 44-55.

Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Pritchett, P. (2007). Hard optimism: how to succeed in a world where positive wins. New York: McGraw Hill.

Radcliffe, N., & Klein, W. (2002). Dispositional, unrealistic, and comparative optimism: Differential relations with the knowledge and processing of risk information and beliefs about personal risk. In Kaniel, R., Massey, C., and Robinson D. T. (n.d.). Optimism without illusion: The impact of experience on expectations.

Rasmussen, H., Wrosch, C., Scheier, M., & Carver, C. (2006). Self-regulation processes and health: The importance of optimism and goal adjustment. In Kaniel, R., Massey, C., and Robinson D. T. (n.d.). Optimism without illusion: The impact of experience on expectations.

Robins, R. W., & Beer, J. S. (2001). Positive Illusions About the Self: Short-Term Benefits and Long-Term Costs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 (2), 340-352.

Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, Coping and Health: Assessment and Implications of Generalized Outcome Expectancies. Health Psychology, 4 (3), 219-247.

Schneider, S. L. (2001). In Search of Realistic Optimism. Meaning, Knowledge, and Warm Fuzziness. American Psychologist, 56 (3), 250-263.

Seligman, M. E. P. (1998). Learned Optimism: How to Change Your Mind and Your Life (2nd Ed). New York: Pocket Books.

Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.

Sheldon, K.M., & King, L. (2001). Why positive psychology is necessary. American Psychologist, 56, 216-217.

Smith, J. C., & Crabbe, J. B. (2000). Emotion and exercise. In Buckworth, J., and Dishman, R. K. (2002). Exercise Psychology. United States: Human Kinetics.

Taylor, S. E., Aspinwall, L. G., & Giuliano, T. A. (1993). Emotions as psychological achievements. In S. H. M. Van Goozen, S. H. M. Van de Poll, & J. A. Sergeant (Eds.), Emotions: Essays on current issues in the field of emotion theory. In Taylor, S. E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1995). Effects of Mindset on Positive Illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (2), 213-226.

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion of well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. In Kaniel, R., Massey, C., and Robinson D. T. (n.d.). Optimism without illusion: The impact of experience on expectations.

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. In Taylor, S. E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1995). Effects of Mindset on Positive Illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (2), 213-226.

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. In Robins, R. W., & Beer, J. S. (2001). Positive Illusions About the Self: Short-Term Benefits and Long-Term Costs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 (2), 340-352.

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994). Positive Illusions and Well-Being Revisited Separating Fact From Fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116 (1), 21-27.

Taylor, S. E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1995). Effects of Mindset on Positive Illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (2), 213-226.

Taylor, S. E., Kemeny, M. E. Reed, G. M., Bower, J. E., & Gruenewald, T. L. (2000). Psychological Resources, Positive Illusions, and Health. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 99-109.

The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1 (1), 3-16. In Linley, P. A., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., & Wood, A. M. (2006). Positive psychology: past, present and (possible) future.

Tiger, L. (1979). Optimism: The biology of hope. In Peterson, C. (2000). The Future of Optimism. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 44-55.

Tiger, L. (1979). Optimism: The biology of hope. In Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Tugade, M. M., Fredrickson, B. L., & Barrett, L. F. (2004). Psychological resilience and positive emotional granularity: Examining the benefits of positive emotions on coping and health. Journal of Personality, 72 (6), 1161-1190.